[krbdev.mit.edu #6647] Memory leak in kdc
Greg Hudson via RT
rt-comment at krbdev.mit.edu
Sat Jan 23 11:49:32 EST 2010
Of course, reply (the non enc-part) is also treated as a container full
of aliases, except for reply.padata, which is treated as owned memory
and initialized/cleaned up. So, fragile as that is, perhaps it's more
consistent with the current design (such as it is) of the function to
treat reply_encpart.enc_padata as owned memory similarly.
Also a less invasive fix for 1.8.
More information about the krb5-bugs
mailing list